Tiny amounts of this miracle molecule make life on Earth possible
Paul Driessen
It’s amazing that minuscule bacteria can cause life-threatening diseases and infections – and miraculous
that tiny doses of vaccines and antibiotics can safeguard us against these deadly scourges. It is equally
incredible that, at the planetary level, carbon dioxide is a miracle molecule for plants – and the “gas of
life” for most living creatures on Earth.
In units of volume, CO2’s concentration is typically presented as 400 parts per million (400 ppm).
Translated, that’s just 0.04% of Earth’s atmosphere – the equivalent of 40 cents out of one thousand
dollars, or 1.4 inches on a football field. Even atmospheric argon is 23 times more abundant: 9,300 ppm.
Moreover, the 400 ppm in 2013 is 120 ppm more than the 280 ppm carbon dioxide level of 1800, and that
two-century increase is equivalent to a mere 12 cents out of $1,000, or one half-inch on a football field.
Eliminate carbon dioxide, and terrestrial plants would die, as would lake and ocean phytoplankton,
grasses, kelp and other water plants. After that, animal and human life would disappear. Even reducing
CO2 levels too much – back to pre-industrial levels, for example – would have terrible consequences.
Over the past two centuries, our planet finally began to emerge from the Little Ice Age that had cooled the
Earth and driven Viking settlers out of Greenland. Warming oceans slowly released some of the carbon
dioxide stored in their waters. Industrial Revolution factories and growing human populations burned
more wood and fossil fuels, baked more bread, and brewed more beer, adding still more CO2 to the
atmosphere. Much more of the miracle molecule came from volcanoes and subsea vents, forest fires,
biofuel use, decaying plants and animals, and “exhaust” from living, breathing animals and humans.
What a difference that extra 120 ppm has made for plants, and for animals and humans that depend on
them. The more carbon dioxide there is in the atmosphere, the more it is absorbed by plants of every
description – and the faster and better they grow, even under adverse conditions like limited water,
extremely hot air temperatures, or infestations of insects, weeds and other pests. As trees, grasses, algae
and crops grow more rapidly and become healthier and more robust, animals and humans enjoy better
nutrition on a planet that is greener and greener.
Efforts to feed seven billion people, and improve nutrition for more than a billion who are malnourished,
are steadily increasing the tension between our need for land to feed humans – and the need to keep land
in its natural state to support plants and wildlife. How well we are able to increase crop production from
the same or less acreage may mean the difference between global food sufficiency and rampant human
starvation in coming decades – and between the survival and extinction of many plant and animal species.
Modern agricultural methods steadily and dramatically improved crop yields per acre between 1930 and
today. That is especially important if we continue to divert millions of acres of farmland from food crops,
and convert millions of acres of rainforest and other wildlife habitat to cropland, for biofuel production to
replace fossil fuels that we again have in abundance. Carbon dioxide will play a vital role in these efforts.
Increased CO2 levels in greenhouses dramatically improve plant growth
Increased CO2 levels in greenhouses dramatically improve plant growth, especially when temperatures
are also elevated; rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have likewise had astounding positive impacts
on outdoor plant growth and survival. Lentils and other legumes grown in hothouses with 700 ppm CO2
improved their total biomass by 91%, their edible parts yield by 150 % and their fodder yield by 67%,
compared to similar crops grown at 370 ppm carbon dioxide, Indian researchers found.
Rice grown at 600 ppm CO2 increased its grain yield by 28% with low applications of nitrogen fertilizer,
Chinese scientists calculated. U.S. researchers discovered that sugarcane grown in sunlit greenhouses at
720 ppm CO2 and 11 degrees F (6 degrees C) higher than outside ambient air produced stem juice an
amazing 124% higher in volume than sugarcane grown at ambient temperature and 360 ppm carbon
dioxide. Non-food crops like cotton also fare much better when carbon dioxide levels are higher.
Research into natural forest and crop growth during recent periods of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide
levels, between 1900 and 2010, found significant improvements under “real-world” conditions, as well.
An analysis of Scots pines in Catalonia, Spain showed that tree diameter and cross-sectional area
expanded by 84% between 1900 and 2000, in response to rising CO2 levels. The growth of young
Wisconsin trees increased by 60%, and tree ring width expanded by almost 53%, as atmospheric carbon
dioxide concentrations increased from 316 ppm in 1958 to 376 ppm in 2003, researchers calculated.
University of Minnesota scientists compared the growth of trees and other plants during the first half of
the twentieth century (which included the terrible Dust Bowl years), when CO2 levels rose only 10 ppm –
to the period 1950-2000, when CO2 increased by 57 ppm. They found that carbon dioxide lowered plant
sensitivity to severe drought and improved their survival rates by almost 50%. Swiss researchers
concluded that, because of rising carbon dioxide levels, “alpine plant life is proliferating, biodiversity is
on the rise, and the mountain world appears more productive and inviting than ever.”
Other researchers used historical (real-world) data for land use, atmospheric CO2 concentration, nitrogen
deposition, fertilization, ozone levels, rainfall and climate, to develop a computer model that simulates
plant growth responses for southern US habitats from 1895 to 2007. They determined that “net primary
productivity” improved by an average of 27% during this 112-year period, with most of the increased
growth occurring after 1950, when CO2 levels rose the most, from 310 ppm in 1950 to 395 ppm in 2007.
How does all this happen? Plants use energy from the sun to convert carbon dioxide from the air, and
water and minerals from the soil, into the carbohydrates and other molecules that form plant biomass.
More CO2 means more and larger flowers; higher seed mass and germination success; and improved
plant resistance to droughts, diseases, viruses, pathogenic infections, air pollutants, and salt or nitrogen
accumulation in soils. Higher CO2 levels also improve plants’ water use efficiency – ensuring faster and
greater carbon uptake by plant tissues, with less water lost through transpiration.
More airborne CO2 lets plants reduce the size of their stomata, little holes in leaves that plants use to
inhale carbon dioxide building blocks. When CO2 is scarce, the openings increase in size, to capture
sufficient supplies of this “gas of life.” But increasing stomata size means more water molecules escape,
and the water loss places increasing stress on the plants, eventually threatening their growth and survival.
When the air’s carbon dioxide levels rise – to 400, 600 or 800 ppm – the stomata shrink in size, causing
them to lose less water from transpiration, while still absorbing ample CO2 molecules. That enables them
to survive extended dry spells much better.
(The
2009 and
2011 volumes of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change report,
Climate Change Reconsidered,
especially this section, and Dr. Craig Idso’s www.CO2science.org
website summarize hundreds of similar studies of crops, forests, grasslands, alpine areas and deserts
enriched by carbon dioxide.
CO2 Science’s Plant Growth Database lets people search for more studies.)
Praise carbon dioxide – not vilify, ban or bury it
One of the worst things that could happen to our planet and its people, animals and plants would be for
carbon dioxide levels to plunge back to levels last seen before the Industrial Revolution. Decreasing CO2
levels would be especially problematical if Earth cools, in response to the sun entering another “quiet
phase,” as happened during the Little Ice Age. If Earth cools again, growing seasons would shorten and
arable cropland would decrease in the northern temperate zones. We would then need every possible
molecule of carbon dioxide – just to keep agricultural production high enough to stave off mass human
starvation ... and save wildlife habitats from being plowed under to replace that lost cropland.
However, even under current Modern Warm Era conditions, crops, other plants, animals and people will
benefit from more carbon dioxide. The “gas of life” is a miracle plant fertilizer that helps plants grow and
prosper – greening the planet, nourishing wildlife habitats, feeding people who crave larger amounts of
more nutritious food, preventing species loss, and even warming the Earth a little.
That is an amazing fete for a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas that comprises just 0.04 percent of our
atmosphere! We should praise carbon dioxide – not vilify, ban or bury it.
Paul Driessen is a senior fellow with the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow and Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise, nonprofit public policy institutes that focus on energy, the environment, economic development and international affairs. This article is from Canada Free Press
A PDF version can be found at klimabedrag.dk.